Climbing Kilimanjaro Archives II |
|||||
Every now and again you need to empty out the backpack and refill it with new material. This is where the
older stories end up.
|
||||
Protein Phobia (June 2003)
I was sipping my morning coffee and glancing over my msn homepage when an article
caught my attention: "Twelve Snacks You Think Are Healthy" by
Sabrina Rogers. Most of the information in the article was at a duh! level - fat free doesn't mean its calorie free, watch
the mayo intake in your tuna sandwitch, don't eat the movie popcorn, etc. But tip number seven caught me by surprise:
7. Protein bars
These were designed for hard-core athletes, so drop that bar if you're not one of them. Although they're not bad for you, they can contain up to 300 calories and more protein than you need in an entire day. Now is that really necessary? The right choice: Before you work out, have a piece of whole-wheat toast with a tablespoon of peanut butter (180 calories) or a fat-free yogurt and half a banana (220 calories). How many grams of protein can there be in a protein bar? 20? 30? Hussman recommends 1 gram of protein per pound of lean body mass per day. That means an average-built woman requires about 20-30 grams of protein per meal... so how can a protein bar have more protein than an adult requires in a whole day? It made me wonder: have I been completely brain washed by the low carbohydrate cult? Am I risking the health of my kidneys while trying to build muscle and burn fat?
Conventional Nutrition Wisdom: Brittle Bones, Renal Failure & Other Doom According to experts, high-protein diets can cause heart disease, stroke, osteoporosis, and kidney stones.(1) Most people on high-protein low-carbohydrate diets lose significant amounts of weight very quickly. However, much of this loss is nothing more than water. As the dieter eats more protein, her body accumulates more of the toxic byproducts of protein breakdown, namely uric acid and urea. The body tried to eliminate these two toxic by-products of protein metabolisis by releasing water in to the kidneys and urinary tract. The side effect of this diuretic effect is that along with uric acid and urea, the body releases essential minerals, including calcium, which can lead to osteoporosis. Studies show that for every additional gram of animal protein added to the diet, the body loses an average 1.75 milligrams of calcium in the urine. (1) As if that wasn't enough, an icrease in minerals deposited in the kidneys can cause painful kidney stones. (1) Recent research indicates that high-protein diets can indeed be hard on the kidneys. Scientists at Harvard's Brigham and Womens Hospital report that women who already have mildly reduced kidney function can create further damage by increasing their intake of animal protein. (2) However, the study's results, which are published in the March 18 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine, do not show any increased risk for women with normal kidney function. (3) A study conducted by researchers from the Heart Institute of Spokane shows that amino acids can damage blood vessels in the kidney, which can lead to kidney hypertension and kidney disease. (4) The study, however, focused only on kidneys of diabetics. (5) Yet another study suggests that diabetics with renal problems should substitute soy protein for animal protein. (6) The conclusion? People with kidney problems should not increase their protein intake. But what about the rest of us?
Balancing Nitrogen and Sanity
If all of that wasn't confusing enough, there is another factor to consider:
nitrogen balance. The RDA standards for protein are meant to cover the nitrogen lost by excretion with nitrogen consumed in
food (remember that nitrogen is a building block of protein, see Nutrition 101). (11) In a healthy adult, the amount of nitrogen lost (through urine, feces and
sweat) must be equal to the amount consumed. Growing children, body builders and pregnant women have positive nitrogen balances
because they are retaining more nitrogen than they are losing. Likewise, people on starvation diets or who are ill have negative
nitrogen balances because they are losing more nitrogen than they are maintaining. (11) Most people can maintain a positive
nitrogen equilibrium by consuming between 0.6 and 1.2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day. (10)
While some researchers have shown that an increase of about 1.7-1.8 grams of
protein per kilogram of body weight in addition to weight training can increase muscle mass, there is little evidence to suggest
that consuming more than 2 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight will be beneficial. (12; 14) That means that
consuming more than 118 grams of protein per day will not help Alice build more muscle.
Sufficiently confused yet? In his best-selling book Body for Life, Bill Phillips makes the following protein recommendation: eat six small meals a
day each consisting of a portion of carbohydrate and a portion of protein. Bill defines a portion as the amount of food that
is about the size of your clenched fist or palm. In the entire book, that is as precise as he gets. No grams, no kilograms
of body weight, just the size of your hand.
So what can be learned from this dizzying search for nutritional consensus? First,
different rules apply to Bob, Testosterone Magazine's most famous couch potato, than to Alice. This makes sense: if Alice trains according to a program
similar to BFL, meaning that she performs three intense weight training workouts and three intensive cardio workouts
a week, then she must increase her protein to maintain a positive nitrogen balance.
Second, attempting to make any sense of the sea of diet information out there
is counter-productive. Paralysis by analysis, as Bill would say. There is no conclusive evidence to show that a protein bar
will cause you to require a kidney transplant down the road (especially if you train your muscles to shreds three times a
week). So go ahead, let go of your protein phobia and grab that Myoplex. Train like there's no tomorrow and your muscles will
thank you.
Sources:
"[The media] neglect to tell the rest of our youth (and everyone else for that matter) that these celebrities have
these wonderful bodies becuase they have the time and money to afford their own personal trainer who works with them 8 hours
a day! I don't know about you, but I can barely make ends meet trying to keep a roof over my head. I certainly don't
have the time to pay a trainer to work with me 4-8 hours a day!"
"While we may have the ability to attain that level of fitness, who among us has the time to wrk out 3-4 hours a
day, especially without someone who will help to beat the boredom that routine brings? Not only that, but howm many of us
come home from working for 8 hours, commuting for 2, may or may not have had a restful night sleep and THEN deal with our
children's, significant other's, and rest of the world's trivia AND prepare low fat, low cal APPEALING meals for our families
and ourselves? How many of us then collapse (exhausted) in front of the boob tube and zone out? Say what you will, having
someone ELSE design the routine for you and that keeps you company while you do, and later you get to sit down to an exquisite
meal (that you didn't have to go the the grocery store to pick up, lug home, put away, and then prepare yourself) doesn't
seem like such a hardship to me."
"Same is true of eating. When you are Cook and Bottle Washer, it's easy to choose a burger instead of a salad. But
when the food is simply placed in front of you, then there's no choice, you eat the salad. That's why weight loss systems
like Jenny Craig work - the dieter has few, if any, food choices IF you stick to the plan."
"If most people spent approx. 3 hrs at a time doing a fitness routine at least once a day, they would end up neglecting
their spouses, children, friends, quite possibly their own jobs, etc."
Yatta, yatta, yatta. (In all fairness, there were posts that refuted the claim that a personal trainer is not crucial
to weight loss but self-motivation is. Unfortunately, these messages were met with more exuses.)
When will people learn not to blame Britney Spears, Alan Greenspan and their own grandmother for the way they look? If
you have love-handles and a beer gut, chances are it's your own damn fault. But it does feel better to blame it on stress
at work, a pregnancy, or McDonald's inadequate notice of the lack of a Big Mac's nutritional value, doesn't it? (And by the
way, how idiotic is it to claim that you thought fast food was healthy and that you didn't see those size 27W pants coming?)
Come on, let's be honest. You know very well that Madonna's personal trainer does not do her workouts for her and that
there's no magic cure for the bulge. But think how much time you've wasted making excuses? Think how much better you'd look
if every minute you complained about genetics or lack of money to hire a personal trainer you had spent running down your
street or lifting paintcans or dumbbells in your garage. Think about all those real-life men and women who work full time
jobs, cook, clean, raise children and still look fantastically fit.
Do you want to know what their secret is? Determination. They wake up an hour earlier, they turn down the office doughnuts,
they take the time to learn how to properly nourish their bodies and how to work them in the most efficient way possible.
They refuse to give in to excuses.
For more of the brutal truth see Testosterone Magazine's "Merry Christmas, Bob."
|
||||